Editorial
Editorial Control Over Model Drafts
Assisted writing is still publishing. Someone has to be responsible for the sentence.
A reviewer with a name
Every public page has an owner: the client, an editor, or us, by agreement. The model is not the owner.
If nobody will review a section, we do not generate it. Unused drafts are cheaper than wrong pages.
Show the source
A useful draft cites the note, PDF, or existing URL it came from. A draft that cannot point at a source gets treated as fiction until proven otherwise.
This matters more for healthcare, travel safety, and pricing than for a headline experiment.
Voice is a constraint, not a vibe
We keep a short voice note: words the business uses, words it will not use, and claims it refuses. Models follow that note unevenly, which is why the review exists.
The goal is a site that still sounds like the same organization after the assistant changes.
Continue
Accessibility Still Comes First
Why GPT, Gemini, Grok, and Claude features must meet the same WCAG 2.2 AA bar as the rest of an Alaska website.
Read →Performance When AI Features Are Added
How to add GPT, Gemini, Grok, or Claude features without wrecking Core Web Vitals or shipping a chat SDK on every page.
Read →Ownership of Prompts, Content, and Outputs
Who owns prompts, drafts, and published pages when GPT, Gemini, Grok, or Claude is part of the website project.
Read →