SEO
SEO Control on Static Sites
Search visibility comes from useful pages and clean technical signals. Builders make both harder to guarantee.
The signals should be in the file
Title, description, canonical, headings, and indexability should be visible in the built HTML, not dependent on an SEO plugin surviving an update.
A static build can fail the deploy if those signals are missing or duplicated. A builder usually cannot.
Builders add URLs you did not mean to publish
Tag archives, thin location clones, attachment pages, and template demos create indexable noise. Cleaning them up is a project of its own.
Static routes are an explicit list. If a page exists, someone meant to ship it.
No trophies
We do not promise a ranking, a traffic multiple, or that Google prefers static HTML as a brand. We promise control over the inputs that matter: speed, structure, internal links, and unique pages.
That is the honest SEO offer.
Continue
Accessibility Inside Page Builders
Why WordPress, Wix, Squarespace, and page builders make WCAG 2.2 AA harder, and why static semantic HTML is the better base.
Read →Leaving WordPress, Wix, and Squarespace
How a move from WordPress, Wix, Squarespace, or another page builder to a static site should protect content, URLs, and search equity.
Read →When a Database Still Belongs
The honest cases where WordPress, an application database, or a builder-like tool still makes sense beside or instead of a static site.
Read →